Reflections #4 |
Reflections
on Presentations
Reframing
Organizations
By:
Mary Rule
This reflection will focus on the presentation made by Mary Rule on
Reframing Organizations. The focus
will include what is meant by reframing and the four frames of change. These
include the structural frame, the human resource frame, the political frame, and
the symbolic frame.
Many organizations are extremely successful and often that success is
attributed to the way they have functioned in the past.
Often their success is a result of those past actions.
However, as situations change, organizations must find ways to
restructure in order to keep up to date in terms of what customers now want and
what their competition is doing to attempt to acquire those customers.
When organizations are willing to change in order to meet the needs of
their constituents, they may be solidifying their place in the marketplace.
The structural frame deals with structures that enable organizations to
increase efficiency through specialization.
This frame appears to me to be one that does not adequately address
customer's needs. I believe the
failure to address these needs can lead to the downfall of even a large
corporation.
The human resource frame places the focus on the human aspect of the
organization. The premise is that
organizations exist to facilitate human interaction so that the interaction that
takes place may benefit everyone. I
believe that this frame addresses an important point.
The human side of business is the most important side of business.
The focus of the political frame seems to be very competitive.
The organization consists of various groups that attempt to gain and hold
the power within the organization. I
believe that this type of competition is destructive and leads to a
deterioration in morale and can lead individuals within an organization to
sabotage others within their own organization.
When reflecting on the symbolic frame, I was interested in the material
within this frame dealing with ambiguity. According
to this frame, high levels of ambiguity undercut rational problem solving and
decision-making. The book that I am
reading, Leading at the Edge of Chaos, would (I believe) challenge this notion.
Although ambiguity may make problem solving more difficult from the point
that more must be considered, it is also the process by which a situation comes
about in which a decision can be made that will facilitate change.